Blog

Explore My News,
Thoughts & Inspiration

The Old Cross & the New – Part II

       The old cross is a symbol of death. It stands for the abrupt, violent end of a human being. The man in Roman times who took up his cross and started down the road had already said good-bye to his friends. He was not coming back. He was going out to have it ended. The cross made no compromise, modified nothing, spared nothing; it slew all of the man, completely and for good. It did not try to keep on good terms with the victim. It struck cruel and hard, and when it had finished its work, the man was no more.


       The race of Adam is under death sentence. There is no commutation and no escape. God cannot approve any of the fruits of sin, however innocent they may appear or beautiful to the eyes of men. God salvages the individual by liquidating him and then raising him again to newness of life.


       The evangelism which draws friendly parallels between the ways of God and the ways of men is false to the Bible and cruel to the souls of its hearers. The faith of Christ does not parallel the world, it intersects it. In coming to Christ we do not bring our old life up onto a higher plane; we leave it at the cross. The corn of wheat must fall into the ground and die.


       We who preach the gospel must not think of ourselves as public relations agents sent to establish good will between Christ and the world. We must not imagine ourselves commissioned to make Christ acceptable to big business, the press, the world of sports or modern education. We are not diplomats but prophets, and our message is not a compromise but an ultimatum.


       God offers life, but not an improved old life. The life He offers is life out of death. It stands always on the far side of the cross. Whoever would possess it must pass under the rod. He must repudiate himself and concur in God¡¯s just sentence against him.


       What does this mean to the individual, the condemned man who would find life in Christ Jesus? How can this theology be translated into life? Simply, he must repent and believe. He must forsake his sins and then go on to forsake himself. Let him cover nothing, defend nothing, excuse nothing. Let him not seek to make terms with God, but let him bow his head before the stroke of God¡¯s stern displeasure and acknowledge himself worthy to die.


       Having done this let him gaze with simple trust upon the risen Saviour, and from Him will come life and rebirth and cleansing and power. The cross that ended the earthly life of Jesus now puts an end to the sinner; and the power that raised Christ from the dead now raises him to a new life along with Christ.


       To any who may object to this or count it merely a narrow and private view of truth, let me say God has set His hallmark of approval upon this message from Paul¡¯s day to the present. Whether stated in these exact words or not, this has been the content of all preaching that has brought life and power to the world through the centuries. The mystics, the reformers, the revivalists have put their emphasis here, and signs and wonders and mighty operations of the Holy Ghost gave witness to God¡¯s approval.


       Dare we, the heirs of such a legacy of power, tamper with the truth? Dare we with our stubby pencils erase the lines of the blueprint or alter the pattern shown us in the Mount? May God forbid. Let us preach the old cross and we will know the old power.

One comment

  1. I wrote out in my Journal on May 28,2006 Sunday about the Gospel taught now bring no change, no call from the past, no requirement for change of life. It is based on Feelings about how we are to react instead of to act for Christ. It is so watered, down that it is drowned out by the world. It does not provide a clear call of contrast for change of life, of heart,or of direction. It is a sound that can not be heard in its dilute down form and offer no call for putting to death the sins of the past.

    The reason for the growth of the Islam religion is it requires that it follower make a dramatic change in their live based on their own efforts. The religion has and is found in the the Christian religion, not Christianity as a discipline of life. My defination of religion is mans attempts with his own efforts through steps by works to be perfect inorder to met God. Christianity is God Coming to man.

    Thank you for this message. I do not feel like I am that only one out here that sees this in the current church. We were called out of the world not to be a part of what it has to offer.

    Mark

Comments are closed.